As said previously mentioned, the SIPOA agreed. But it was Improper to take action. It wasn't the SIPOA’s location to unilaterally abandon the easement, due to the fact other functions experienced Exclusive property interest in it – particularly, the owners of plenty 21-28 that benefitted from the drainage easement. , https://covenantsandlanduserestri77443.59bloggers.com/31563936/top-co-ownership-and-partition-advocate-in-karachi-secrets